dubal Posted May 16, 2012 Report Share Posted May 16, 2012 Hi folks, Please help me decide. 8400 has 800x480 resolution vs 480x240 of 4400. Will that make a lot of difference in screen display quality and DVD playback clarity? Additionally, 8400 has SD card slot, Mixtrax, advance app mode, dual zone audio/video, detachable face. 4400 does not. Mostly, I am tempted by the higher screen resolution. I will need to buy a kit to install it in my 2007 Honda CRV. On the other hand, this Custron unit has everying plus the necessary frame for CRV, and cheaper: http://www.autodvdgps.com/custron-t1070crv-aftermarket-dvd-gps-navi-headunit-update-bluetooth-phonebook-for-honda-crv-p-1410.html Your advice please. Thanks in advance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AEDan1977 Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 Yes its worth it... its almost like comparing a High Def TV to a regular TV, it just looks better, clearer, and crisper... spend the little bit extra and you wont regret it later. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kuj0317 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I would say its toss up between the 8400 and the custron. The custron will not require a mounting kit, and will have OEM looking buttons, which is huge in my opinion. Schoche/Metra mounting kits, needed for the pioneers, suck, but they are the best we have. Personally, I got a 3400, and quickly upgraded to an 8400. I never touched the 4400, but I REALLY like the 8400. It really looks nice. If you go to amazon, the price diff is a bit over $100, which is significant, but totally worth it IMO over the 4400. The screen looks nice. It was easy to wire up, and I am happy with it, despite its aftermarket looks. If you REALLY value stock looks, I woudl go with the custron. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.