Jump to content
AVIC411.com

dodgeboy

Members
  • Content Count

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About dodgeboy

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Thank you very much for your detailed reply! I guess what was confusing me is the difference between the XM map you posted, and the Sirius map here: http://www.sirius.com/wo/i/traffic_weat ... troit.html Wouldn't it stand to reason that XM and Sirius would get their traffic information from the same place, and send out the same data? The sirius map basically has flow information for all of the roads, and the XM map only has it for the main arteries around Detroit. I really appreciate all of your info. It looks like I'm stuck with the limited coverage in the car. Dave
  2. I've had my Z2 for 3-4 years now (basically since its release). Since I first got it, the roads covered with traffic information has not changed. There are tons of roads in my (Detroit) area that are now traffic enabled, but this receiver only shows portions of large highways with coverage. Is this a limitation of the receiver, XM tuner, or XM NavTraffic itself? I have Sirius (Mygig) in my truck, and it has probably 10-20x the amount of coverage in Michigan. And it seems like roads get added (or extended) every few months. Since XM and Sirius are the same parent company, I'd assume that
  3. Am I the only one that's disappointed to see that all of the new units appear to be based on the software from the F-Series? I will be amazed if they iron out the bugs, and the slowness of that interface before all of the new units are released. They have a LONG way to go with the F-Series, to make it anywhere near as usable as my old Z2. I will also miss the XM NavTraffic on my Z2... MSN Direct is just not nearly as comprehensive as XM NavTraffic. Why does it seem that everyone is dropping XM NavTraffic? The screens look very good, and the bootup time of the Z series seems good.
  4. AWESOME, thank you, I will be linking my vids and referencing this new forum as well. Thanks! I look forward to having a place to call 'home' for the DNX units...
  5. I sensed some demand for a forum for the DNX units, so I created one here: http://www.kenwoodforums.com I'm not trying to detract from avic411 at all--this site is amazing, and will always continue to be the leader for avic information. But I've seen several posts about the lack of a forum for the kenwoods, so I thought I'd throw one up. It's pretty basic for now, but as the user base grows, I'll customize it more. As an aside, I still haven't received my DNX9140, but I will post a review on here when I get it. Dave
  6. Thanks for posting the vids... They are very helpful in making a decision on the unit. I've gotta say I'm pretty disappointed in the voice command. I don't really see the point of having voice command if you still have to look at the screen to direct the unit (line1, line3, etc.). It's especially disappointing that it doesn't understand name/number inputs for addresses. Even my old Z2 does this (and does it well). Is there any way around the track skipping lag? Can you disable the album art, or find any other workaround? That is a pretty big issue for me, and reeks of a forced
  7. Are you going to post that stuff in this thread, or in a new thread? (just so I know where to watch)... Thanks, Dave
  8. Good point. but at least the nav part will be solid (Garmin)...
  9. Thanks for the tip!! I was going to order one this weekend, and you just saved me $400! I can't wait to get this unit...
  10. That unit does look pretty nice. I like the look of the interface, too. Unfortunately, it looks like it only does the FM/RDS traffic information. I'm not sure if that information is less detailed/accurate than the XM stuff on my Z2, or if the F series implementation is just less detailed/accurate. Either way, the information my F900 shows is almost useless, as compared to the very detailed information that my Z2 shows me (actual speed of highway in each direction, exact location and nature of accident/construction). The F series doesn't even consistently define what side of the highway th
  11. Agree, but I almost exclusively listen to my ipod in my truck (the vehicle that currently has the F900BT). I'd find it very difficult to use the iPod on a daily basis with the speed of the controls on the Z2/Z3. If I listened to one playlist all the time, it would be fine. Unfortunately, I jump around from artist to artist a lot. That's very difficult to do on the Z2. Why the heck haven't they released a Z4 with a fast ipod interface?!
  12. The one thing that bothers me about Kenwoods is the Garming GPS integration. One very simple thing that I would really like to have is a consistent location for the clock on the screen, regardless of what mode the unit is in. The F900 failed miserably at this, and the Kenwoods do too, because of the Garmin GPS. Hopefully the newer units integrate better... Thanks for the press release. The unit sounds impressive!
  13. Thanks for the tip on the Kenwood. I may wait it out, since I won't be driving my truck as much in the summer.
  14. I've had it since the week it was released. I'm actually surprised I've put up with it for as long as I have, considering how frustrating it can be to use at times. I really do like all of the customization, but...
  15. I'm sad to say that I'm looking to replace my F900BT. I've been driving my summer car (AVIC-Z2 equipped) the last couple weeks since the weather warmed up, and it has made the shortcomings of the F900 all too apparent. I'm tired of the overall sluggishness, incessant ramblings of the NAV voice, and the poor traffic data from MS. I will miss the hackable customization, the screen, and many other things about the unit, but it has to go. So my question is, what should I move to? Ideally I'd like a Z2/Z3 with the ipod controls of the F900BT. Since that doesn't exist, I'm going to have t
×
×
  • Create New...