Search Archive

I have the z130bt in one car, z140bh in another, and...

By troydavies · Apr 06, 2012in General💬 14 posts👁️ 4,745 views
Posted Apr 06, 2012 · 13:12 UTC#1

I'm just a regular guy when it comes to car radios. In my opinion. my z130bt is better than the newer z140bh. To me, the biggest problem is that the z140bh removed voice control inputing directions and finding POIs. I have no idea why they did this, but it is a fatal flaw. And since I don't care about Pandora, not much into Aha, and I don't have an Iphone, I don't see how the z140bh will help me. As far as speed, maybe the z140bh is just a little faster, but it's not such a big deal one way or the other.

 

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but I really think the z140bh is a DOWNGRADE from the z130bt. I am also seeing the prices for the 140bh dropping down and sometimes below the 130bt. I think Pioneer dropped the ball on this one. Can anyone suggest a reason for my keeping the 140bh and not returning it and getting a 130bt?

Edited Apr 06, 2012 by troydavies
Posted Apr 06, 2012 · 14:13 UTC#2

I think you answered your own question. I don't think I'll be upgrading the software on my 130 either when released this summer.

Posted Apr 06, 2012 · 16:30 UTC#3

I guess the direction of my question is why?

 

Why would Pioneer release an inferior product and tout it as an upgrade? I just hope I'm not missing anything here.

Edited Apr 06, 2012 by troydavies
Posted Apr 06, 2012 · 21:58 UTC#4

It is feudal to ask why when it comes to Pioneer or any of these head unit manufactures. Kenwood recently did the same thing with their new unit and people are asking why. But we have been asking why about Pioneer sense I've been on this forum so it is likely you will never get an answer that makes sense.

Posted Apr 30, 2012 · 00:09 UTC#5

How do we get video from htc evo 4g to avic z110bt ex Netflix

Way off topic. Start a new thread.
Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 08:47 UTC#6

I called Pioneer before I purchased the z130bt. I read the description on the z140bh and it said that the voice controls were absent. I called to verify this and in deed it was. So, I purchased the z130 over the z140.

Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 16:42 UTC#7

The voice recognition for POI and addresses is slow and sluggish. It gets simple things like "Omaha" incorrect, so my guess is they just gave up making it work properly. Pure conjecture, though.

 

Aren't the map features better with the 140BH, though?

Edited Jun 14, 2012 by stargate125645
Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 18:25 UTC#8

It probably just has some updated roads. Nothing special.

Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 19:35 UTC#9

Wait...if they got rid of voice recognition, does the push-to-talk steering wheel button just go to the contacts list then?

Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 19:37 UTC#10

Not sure

Posted Jun 14, 2012 · 21:50 UTC#11

does the push-to-talk steering wheel button just go to the contacts list then?

 

Yes.

Posted Jun 20, 2012 · 23:07 UTC#12

I'm just a regular guy when it comes to car radios. In my opinion. my z130bt is better than the newer z140bh. To me, the biggest problem is that the z140bh removed and finding POIs.

 

Can you confirm the search by POI was removed - that sounds silly - it's one of the only things I use for nav...

Posted Jun 21, 2012 · 00:01 UTC#13

Yeah, Pioneer finally found a way to reduce bootlegging of their paid upgrade software, make the newer version worse than the previous model.

Posted Jul 16, 2012 · 01:55 UTC#14

It is feudal to ask why when it comes to Pioneer or any of these head unit manufactures. Kenwood recently did the same thing with their new unit and people are asking why. But we have been asking why about Pioneer sense I've been on this forum so it is likely you will never get an answer that makes sense.

I think you meant "futile" but "feudal" may be a good way to describe Pioneer...