Driver's view is, in a word, DREADFUL, if not completely USELESS... It is horribly inaccurate (off by 100 to 150 feet) and the streets have no names. I have checked to make sure the speed pulse is working properly...it is. It's not just a matter of aesthetics...this type of view is (when properly implemented) particularly useful in complex intersections such as a traffic rotary, and at night. Am I missing something here? Three year old cheap TomTom did a far better job. Why isn't the "drivers view at least learning"? Is this something that could be addressed with new maps? I am not interested in hearing "get a z1/z2" or other rubbish...not when I've spent close to 2 grand including add ons and installation,,,, ![]()
Posted May 05, 2007 · 19:45 UTC#1